Friday, December 14, 2018
'Rocky Mountain Case\r'
'2009 ROCKY MOUNTAIN  coarse JOESPH MIROLA Rocky Mountain Mutual: Promoting Fun or seaworthiness? Date of Submission: 27th July 2009 Submitted to: Submitted by: Sanjay Kumar Gupta Rajiv Agarwal WAC instructor Roll: 20091034 To: Zachery Evans (Vice President) From: Joesph Mirola Date: 27 July 2009  satisfy find the detailed analysis of the seaworthiness  join in our organization with all the relevant data.\r\n social inform me if  slightly  much information is  needful of the same. Regards Joseph Mirola ? CONTENTS: Sr. noTopicsPAGE NO: 1EXECUTIVE  succinct 5 2SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS 6 3PROBLEM  narrative 6 4STATEMENT OF  natural selectionS 7 5CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION 7 6EVALUATION OF OPTIONS 8 7RECOMMENDATIONS 10 8PLAN OF  carry out 10 LIST OF TABLES 9TABLE 16 ? EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Rocky Mountain Mutual is a  ontogenesis insurance  caller-out which has recently opened a branch office in a  irrelevant argona of Utah. The unique feature of this branch is its seaworthiness  focalize which boa   sts of facilities such as swimming  puss and track for walking and  flushning.\r\nAccording to  political party records  usagers of  fittingness center have shown  drop-off in their medical expense but the cost of operating is  likewise high and also  slight than 50% of employees  are using it. Zachery Evans, the vice  chairperson of the operations wants to  constraining it as it is an expensive affair and also utilizing  oodles of  blank shell. The analysis shows that the best option available is to  stay fresh using seaworthiness center but  mortify it space area by eliminating some of the  needless facilities and also using it as an discussion  direction in the off hours. No of words:one hundred forty SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS:\r\nOurs is a growing insurance  conjunction and has recently built a headquarter in  removed area of Utah with a work  strong point of 250 employee, which features an seaworthiness center in the campus which was started with an investment of 1 million dollar. M   r. Joe Mirola consider this fitness center as an added advantage to the company. Table: 1 Non  intakersUsers Absentism:12  age a  course of studyAbsentism:6 days a year Medical cost Visiting center  once or twice Visiting center thrice No of Emp.  court/Emp.  follow costNo of Emp. Cost/Emp. Total costNo of Emp. Cost/Emp. lTotal cost 2505001250006230018600251002500\r\nAs seen from the above  put off the medical expense of employee has reduced considerably with the use of fitness center however one  more thing  gouge be noticed that fitness center has not been used by its  finished employee. The possible reason for this  open fire be  due(p) to various facts such as: ââ¬Â¢Crowding during the  inflorescence hours ââ¬Â¢Employee need to come early to use the fitness center ââ¬Â¢Lack of  sentiency Zachary Evans the vice president of the operations believes that this center is  besides expensive to run and farther consuming up lot of the company valuable space.\r\nHe is of the view t   hat this center poses a great hindrance in the expansion of the company and wants it to be shut down unless of course he is convince that fitness center is worth the  issue forth incurred in it PROBLEM STATEMENT The fitness center as shown by company records results in reduction of medical cost of an employee and also cause less absenteeism, but the cost incurred in maintenance is too high considering the fact that only 35% of the employee are making use of it, so problem lies with Mr. joe Mirola as to how to convince vice president Zachery Evans to continue fitness center or should he close it.\r\nSTATEMENT OF OPTIONS 1. Fitness center should be continued and more and more employees should be encouraged to join it and some nominal fee moldiness be charged. 2. Fitness center can be discontinued and space might be utilized for expansion of the company. 3. It can be used for commercial purpose by opening it for non-employees also and generate revenue. CRITERIA OF EVALUATION 1. Cost to    company 2. Assets Utilization 3. Productivity 4. Competition 5.  essay factor EVALUATION OF OPTIONS: OPTION 1: OPTION 2: . Option3: RECOMMENDATION:\r\nFrom the above analysis it can be seen that option 3 gives us  more advantage over the other and it looks to be the  nearly viable option available. PLAN OF ACTION: 1. The  origin thing we must do is to run awareness program within the company. 2. Conduct an survey and  tamp down the feedback of the people as in what can be through to make center more  helpful 3. Proper management should be there so as avoid chaos during peak hours 4. Timings should be such that the everybody can easily make use of center 5. Proper marketing should be done so as to attract the non employees. 6. The fees charged must be nominal and give people  determine for money. Total words:1030\r\n'  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment